I agree that judges should not be telling juries what facts are. The judge should stick to explaining the meaning if any legal jargon and deciding what is admissible as evidence etc. The majority of humans worship authority and therefore are too susceptible to being told what to think. There are so many miscarriages of justice and unfair trials in UK that it is hard to keep up . Don't know enough yet on this case but sounds like there are certainly issues with it. This is why I would never support the reintroduction of the death sentence in britain
Very interesting, I watched that documentary, very good , thanks for sharing this, I actually do remember the judge directing us when I was juror but it didn’t influence me, it was actually as a piece of evidence given at the end and I thought it very odd to wait till the end to share this vital information!
I agree that judges should not be telling juries what facts are. The judge should stick to explaining the meaning if any legal jargon and deciding what is admissible as evidence etc. The majority of humans worship authority and therefore are too susceptible to being told what to think. There are so many miscarriages of justice and unfair trials in UK that it is hard to keep up . Don't know enough yet on this case but sounds like there are certainly issues with it. This is why I would never support the reintroduction of the death sentence in britain
Very interesting, I watched that documentary, very good , thanks for sharing this, I actually do remember the judge directing us when I was juror but it didn’t influence me, it was actually as a piece of evidence given at the end and I thought it very odd to wait till the end to share this vital information!